Wednesday, January 31, 2007

What colour am I?

Saw this the other day - a rather fine test to find out what kind of house-paint you are!

Filled it in, but I'm not sure the program is working alright - I came out as 'Goth Black'! Now where could it have got an idea like that from?!

I am
Longs Drugs "Goth Black" matte interior latex

For the ultimate (but affordable) gloom&doom bedroom.

Which house paint are you?

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Monkey mayhem


I got quite a bit of stick for scalpaling my stuffed monkey to the door. In retrospect I guess it does send a somewhat disturbing image!

I've consented to the feelings of those around me and removed the little fella from the door. Those of you who care about the plight of stuffed animals will also be pleased to learn I have removed the scalpel from his chest.

It was some pretty major surgery, but I'm pleased to announce he came through unscathed. Well, almost. Unfortunatly the surgeon slipped and drove the blade through his hands - a case of simian stigmata.

Is it weird to think he looks cuter with bits of metal through him than not? Oh dear...

Planning Wiki

I've been meaning to link to Russell Davies' site for sometime, but I've been waiting for him to write something worth repeating. Well, I got bored waiting and settled for this instead!

Actually, its a brilliant idea, a planning wiki.

I always see these wikis as being a little bit like creches - somewhere to leave the nippers safe in the knowledge that high walls and strong locks will keep them in and everyone else out. And so you get these amazing micrcosoms full of happy, sad, shouty, quiet people all playing the same game but all playing in slightly different ways. And if there are any tantrums, well, they're only kids!

Freedom of Information?

British MP's have rather connivingly excluded themselves from the Freedom of Information Act, under a very slippery piece of manourvering that demonstrates our elected representatives complete disregard for those they are paid to represnet...

Of course Britain is a far less democratic country than we imagine; the mother of democracy is well into her dotage and many of her most enshrined principles are rapidly being encroached.

This latest attempt places MP's personal finances and dealings outside of the Freedom of Information Act, thus securing privacy and freedom for their affairs. Perhaps a right for the ordinary person, but MP's have forefitted their right to be ordinary. Like celebrities they have made a pact with the public and have no right to complain or hide from our inquiries. Indeed, given their great power - and frequent misuse of it - we need more transparency, not less.

Particularly galling is this quote from David Maclean who introduced the ammendment.
""I am showing some of the younger hands how you can get a bill through parliament after long experience as a whip in both getting and blocking bills through parliament."

Alternatively, "I am showing some of the younger hands how you can subvert and ignore a centuries old legislative system through shameless tricks and weak-willed compatriots to institute an unjust and unnecessary piece of procedure that aids only us."

It strikes me that as the Labour Party have embraced private finance and outsourcing they have transformed themselves from elected representatives to an unelected board of directors. By removing themselves from the common fold politicians are transforming themselves into an oligarchy, a self-serving group who look out for each other almost irrespective of party. They are no more representing our interests than a company has to represent the needs of its consumers and so it is our responsibility to wake them up.

If there is to be any hope of safeguarding a culture of openness and transparency, the British political system needs to lift the portcullis and invite us in to see inside it the way an increasing number of brands are doing. But as long as MP's can pass self-serving hypocritical measuers like this, and not be subject the vagaries of the consumer, sorry voter, I guess that's not likely.

Monday, January 29, 2007

Why aren't brands more individual?

So I was out at Antisocial on Saturday; a fantastic club if you like neon acid hands up flourescent dance music. Fortunately that sort of stuff rocks my boat gale force five.



Anways, there I was admiring the beautiful people - the boys, the girls, the somewhere inbetweens - when I thought, it's not beauty its bravery.

Being brave enough to brighten up put on the makeup and go-out for the sheer fuck of it without any care in the world. OK, it's not like thats a brand new phenomenon; people have been dressing up for centuries and I've got some great photos of my Dad in the 70s to prove it.

But when was the last time a brand dressed up? When was the last time a brand put on make-up and dared show another face? And here I'm specifically thinking a nice big juicy mass-market brand. Brands seem the equivalent of the sad old bastard who always goes out wearing the same clothes. How far would you get if you always said the same thing in the same tone with the same shallow smile? And yet thats what we continue to do as we crucify ourselves over words on a page - brand pyramids, onions, turtles and the like are all straight-jackets that inhibit flamboyance and personality. As brand guardians we are so paranoid about putting the wrong foot forward, we tie our shoe-laces together and trip over them.

And lets not overestimate the importance of flamboyance. It signals a great big unafraid of the world attitude that wants to change things and won't take no for an answer - and isn't that what brands are all about with their visions, manifestos and beliefs? One size beliefs do not fit all - we need to break them apart, find ways of dressing them that suit not only our target but our mood.

What if brands decided to have a extroverted phase? To die their hair red or get a clothes makeover? What if they didn't worry about saying the same all the time and adopted some of the unpredicatbility and individuality of their audience. I admit the results would be unpredicatable... but surely more interesting than the same smart-casual we get today...

Friday, January 26, 2007

Our front door




I got this little chap the other day, and combined my twin pleasures of scalpels and abusing toy monkeys - hence is ending up nailed to the door. Ain't he cute?

Tom tries to explain his strategy to The Independent

"OK, so carbon emissions will increase, and penguins might die, but this all part and parcel of our guilt trip lifestlye nowadays."

Steph's guide to presenting creative work

"BIGGER THAN LAST TIME!"

Welcome to Tom and Stephs' Office

Please please, come in, make yourself comfortable.

There's two red chairs, so put your feet up and listen to us prattle on about nothing much in particular. I'm tom by the way. I'm sure Steph will be saying hello soon.

For anyone whose interested though, at 12pm, Steph will be catching up with E&J to talk through some stuff thats already been reviewed. Fascinating!

I'll probably just be surfing the net.